| Message ID | 20230517113619.82808-1-frank@lichtenheld.com |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Headers |
Return-Path: <openvpn-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net>
Delivered-To: patchwork@openvpn.net
Received: by 2002:a05:7300:7b9a:b0:c3:1364:a2a2 with SMTP id j26csp1114439dyk;
Wed, 17 May 2023 04:36:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-Smtp-Source:
ACHHUZ7dEWCee7+7A1eITAk921yTT/jAcluTesL8zBgUAXuaqNL4qCLb4P47FE2yEaMHM97eM/g3
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:6d1:b0:325:cc57:df63 with SMTP id
p17-20020a056e0206d100b00325cc57df63mr1767471ils.22.1684323419433;
Wed, 17 May 2023 04:36:59 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1684323419; cv=none;
d=google.com; s=arc-20160816;
b=SciQNs1Rysivx9jVmhnb9Lh/S0E87/kKIiUjxvC9JsL5vPi735OwLRdmHFwKzE5htY
ADMvqHk/O1xWkpnVIDRzXlWTM2pasWv5U4u55cFGl2jqi/Ytu8pBB1BfSgEJYvjeCI9G
hxQMKTJHztb6nkYrXLvQwZfwyOvGdXIyXujoxZVt1bptLDxc4ZTLJE7PZhMRAmr4G76Z
DCrYd45YEjSQM2WKd3wzscOqdhnv1nGwTzhrfEtJRHF0MYIVYEknbtHqroJkceUpZe4f
+4AeiIoGZoFG258/WXXKYAQFLDrmrRyMGSHIb+3vmRbaKwfG/2n87LPiskuZTISrrAmy
TwYg==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com;
s=arc-20160816;
h=errors-to:content-transfer-encoding:list-subscribe:list-help
:list-post:list-archive:list-unsubscribe:list-id:precedence:subject
:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:to:from
:dkim-signature:dkim-signature:dkim-signature;
bh=vFLgrZSHlSSOgRfd4YFO37z3ZJCW32qU5eGb2hR/VHg=;
b=vM/yV89bDHgNt5GksenmfQprWDUJ4m4a0tldiIQ2fCnkOXMd+mP2U1fs8/p0J0MQqL
SZ+28hWmXrrY1o8r3ryhJyAeS1nYxnXM2C9OIMDiw+Oo4/XuRi65ORzjm0jnZjs4URyH
TYbOyt3lzGj40KSr413cPOe3ZcA5q6gNzUTseb8DlgZl6M82JI+ZKMldcEGl/btDbh7n
L0OsJ0cQn+LWIKgBwA8/honZGXLa8WXJAWuzhBxvC/+I6570jYwEau7Ay7nue/xcmO43
rf1CqfzVkh2Bm5k+JRH5iXf5znjLaRCI9MCeMXNgKnl0vZcQZDcgGlbLTeAYM6IrlH1R
eOQQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@sourceforge.net
header.s=x header.b=YpZSkvgo;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@sf.net header.s=x
header.b=EoNzDfQQ;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@lichtenheld.com
header.s=MBO0001 header.b=C9ysUSTY;
spf=pass (google.com: domain of
openvpn-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net designates 216.105.38.7 as
permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=openvpn-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net
Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net. [216.105.38.7])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id
p4-20020a056e0206c400b003384138045csi169318ils.184.2023.05.17.04.36.58
(version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Wed, 17 May 2023 04:36:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of
openvpn-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net designates 216.105.38.7 as
permitted sender) client-ip=216.105.38.7;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@sourceforge.net
header.s=x header.b=YpZSkvgo;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@sf.net header.s=x
header.b=EoNzDfQQ;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@lichtenheld.com
header.s=MBO0001 header.b=C9ysUSTY;
spf=pass (google.com: domain of
openvpn-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net designates 216.105.38.7 as
permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=openvpn-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com)
by sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.95)
(envelope-from <openvpn-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net>)
id 1pzFSP-0006Hw-BU;
Wed, 17 May 2023 11:36:37 +0000
Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls
TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.95)
(envelope-from <frank@lichtenheld.com>) id 1pzFSN-0006Ho-DD
for openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net;
Wed, 17 May 2023 11:36:35 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version
:References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date:Subject:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:
Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:
Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:
List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
bh=YZ0U1x/xXrYdD/TTVS+6POgVR5lbx54j0dRtOrILNzk=; b=YpZSkvgos/AXK0W5JhyUa+SLIt
jerCVGXJvo0d257Al+u9oDj9bpQ3E0qvbqt6njUTHLmzGvNNK6VPmEJq+bwKNKZmilxI5DKO2pIsr
8SLbCaL3Ab/IrVNvOhXouz7CDe6yIlWBs7WnFFiQg9MCFmq78qfSJsf7WO1qTjZ+Ng3s=;
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x
;
h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:
In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date:Subject:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:
Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc
:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:
List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
bh=YZ0U1x/xXrYdD/TTVS+6POgVR5lbx54j0dRtOrILNzk=; b=EoNzDfQQ1QSHG6PU6ppAqKgSpK
7T2lGUN/18LgJi3+kJIpFVbH7mNiOnFpf6BL249RRn5/2wpYO4oy8Gw/rOy35gl0Rgbswtf287/8n
jxxNEG6rDaQCNjZl+o9L90bN5LQdu+71N2ZVytOUF4Zt9IOkDSr1TLKTAeeEz+nXjSF8=;
Received: from mout-p-101.mailbox.org ([80.241.56.151])
by sfi-mx-2.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps
(TLS1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.95)
id 1pzFSI-0001FL-78 for openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net;
Wed, 17 May 2023 11:36:35 +0000
Received: from smtp202.mailbox.org (smtp202.mailbox.org
[IPv6:2001:67c:2050:b231:465::202])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange ECDHE (P-384) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest
SHA256) (No client certificate requested)
by mout-p-101.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4QLrfD3cqkz9skk
for <openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Wed, 17 May 2023 13:36:20 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lichtenheld.com;
s=MBO0001; t=1684323380;
h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:
in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
bh=YZ0U1x/xXrYdD/TTVS+6POgVR5lbx54j0dRtOrILNzk=;
b=C9ysUSTYJUSN6jk4ocFaTnpkgumEpfWQP3y9VF9L9nDCIt1VrqGSGT80mZGhRddwYBoXsU
OP+Rjj9kZesS2sr/IsU/H7jBSHCUQuCNr5Nyg/9eQQxKxHRWsRQGYocQj/cle7iJ4mlSpF
Bz4QoWGEQ6sl0OdeaOQJHrssm4kXCyZ8b9jM9pTCv3Y9cZ+oYk1jcz3FJv+Tfy9DDVjtue
5ecTAW4TKVBPjLNhwMUXF0gTVUlqs2UT1j6L8Gqqt6f4CmurBgalViQfsYklSoF3vwqlX+
iEIwriTFLcNG8KSJ0U6EppY1FDhZZH025gPJ2uw7JgVPL4ulitfRuVev9lY5iQ==
From: Frank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.com>
To: openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 13:36:19 +0200
Message-Id: <20230517113619.82808-1-frank@lichtenheld.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230517084422.70547-1-frank@lichtenheld.com>
References: <20230517084422.70547-1-frank@lichtenheld.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4QLrfD3cqkz9skk
X-Spam-Score: -0.9 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software,
running on the system "util-spamd-2.v13.lw.sourceforge.com",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: Since we use strlen() to determine the length and then check
it ourselves, there is really no point in using strncpy. But the compiler
might complain that we use the output of strlen() for the length of strncpy
which is usually a sign for bugs:
Content analysis details: (-0.9 points, 6.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ----------------------
--------------------------------------------------
-0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
low trust [80.241.56.151 listed in list.dnswl.org]
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily
valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
envelope-from domain
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
-0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available.
X-Headers-End: 1pzFSI-0001FL-78
Subject: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH 1/2 v4] buffer: use memcpy in buf_catrunc
X-BeenThere: openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: <openvpn-devel.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/options/openvpn-devel>,
<mailto:openvpn-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive:
<http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=openvpn-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:openvpn-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel>,
<mailto:openvpn-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Errors-To: openvpn-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net
X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: Inbox
X-GMAIL-THRID: =?utf-8?q?1761624870130583212?=
X-GMAIL-MSGID: =?utf-8?q?1766141113648355928?=
|
| Series |
[Openvpn-devel,1/2,v4] buffer: use memcpy in buf_catrunc
|
|
Commit Message
Frank Lichtenheld
May 17, 2023, 11:36 a.m. UTC
Since we use strlen() to determine the length
and then check it ourselves, there is really
no point in using strncpy.
But the compiler might complain that we use
the output of strlen() for the length of
strncpy which is usually a sign for bugs:
error: ‘strncpy’ specified bound depends
on the length of the source argument
[-Werror=stringop-overflow=]
Warning was at least triggered for
mingw-gcc version 10-win32 20220113.
Also change the type of len to size_t
which avoids potential problems with
signed overflow.
v2:
- make len size_t and change code to avoid any theoretical overflows
- remove useless casts
v3:
- fix off-by-one introduced by v2 %)
v4:
- ignore unsigned overflow to simplify code
Change-Id: If4a67adac4d2e870fd719b58075d39efcd67c671
Signed-off-by: Frank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.com>
---
src/openvpn/buffer.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Comments
Acked-by: Gert Doering <gert@greenie.muc.de> Change looks good (less +/-1, so easier for my old brain), and our nice and shiny new unit test confirms that things still work. Your patch has been applied to the master branch. commit c89a97e449baaf60924a362555d35184f188a646 Author: Frank Lichtenheld Date: Wed May 17 13:36:19 2023 +0200 buffer: use memcpy in buf_catrunc Signed-off-by: Frank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.com> Acked-by: Gert Doering <gert@greenie.muc.de> Message-Id: <20230517113619.82808-1-frank@lichtenheld.com> URL: https://www.mail-archive.com/openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg26683.html Signed-off-by: Gert Doering <gert@greenie.muc.de> -- kind regards, Gert Doering
diff --git a/src/openvpn/buffer.c b/src/openvpn/buffer.c index d099795b..7725438e 100644 --- a/src/openvpn/buffer.c +++ b/src/openvpn/buffer.c @@ -316,10 +316,10 @@ buf_catrunc(struct buffer *buf, const char *str) { if (buf_forward_capacity(buf) <= 1) { - int len = (int) strlen(str) + 1; + size_t len = strlen(str) + 1; if (len < buf_forward_capacity_total(buf)) { - strncpynt((char *)(buf->data + buf->capacity - len), str, len); + memcpy(buf->data + buf->capacity - len, str, len); } } }