@@ -52,21 +52,34 @@
} \
}
-#define NLMSG_TAIL(nmsg) \
- ((struct rtattr *)(((uint8_t *)(nmsg)) + NLMSG_ALIGN((nmsg)->nlmsg_len)))
-
#define SITNL_NEST(_msg, _max_size, _attr) \
({ \
- struct rtattr *_nest = NLMSG_TAIL(_msg); \
+ struct rtattr *_nest = sitnl_nlmsg_tail(_msg); \
SITNL_ADDATTR(_msg, _max_size, _attr, NULL, 0); \
_nest; \
})
-#define SITNL_NEST_END(_msg, _nest) \
- { \
- _nest->rta_len = (void *)NLMSG_TAIL(_msg) - (void *)_nest; \
+#define SITNL_NEST_END(_msg, _nest) \
+ { \
+ _nest->rta_len = (void *)sitnl_nlmsg_tail(_msg) - (void *)_nest; \
}
+/* This function was originally implemented as a macro, but compiling with
+ * gcc and -O3 was getting confused about the math and thus raising
+ * security warnings on subsequent memcpy() calls.
+ *
+ * Converting the macro to a function was not enough, because gcc was still
+ * inlining it and falling in the same math trap.
+ *
+ * The only way out to avoid any warning/error is to force the function to
+ * not be inline'd.
+ */
+static __attribute__ ((noinline)) void *
+sitnl_nlmsg_tail(const struct nlmsghdr *nlh)
+{
+ return (unsigned char *)nlh + NLMSG_ALIGN(nlh->nlmsg_len);
+}
+
/**
* Generic address data structure used to pass addresses and prefixes as
* argument to AF family agnostic functions
@@ -130,7 +143,7 @@
return -EMSGSIZE;
}
- rta = NLMSG_TAIL(n);
+ rta = sitnl_nlmsg_tail(n);
rta->rta_type = type;
rta->rta_len = len;