[Openvpn-devel] Add PKG_CHECK_VAR compatibility definition for old autoconf versions
| Message ID | 20210318161609.76073-1-juliusz@wolfssl.com |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers |
Return-Path: <openvpn-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net> Delivered-To: patchwork@openvpn.net Delivered-To: patchwork@openvpn.net Received: from director10.mail.ord1d.rsapps.net ([172.27.255.53]) by backend30.mail.ord1d.rsapps.net with LMTP id KPJcH9WBU2CTXgAAIUCqbw (envelope-from <openvpn-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net>) for <patchwork@openvpn.net>; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 12:37:41 -0400 Received: from proxy15.mail.iad3a.rsapps.net ([172.27.255.53]) by director10.mail.ord1d.rsapps.net with LMTP id +Lz+HtWBU2BSKgAApN4f7A (envelope-from <openvpn-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net>) for <patchwork@openvpn.net>; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 12:37:41 -0400 Received: from smtp52.gate.iad3a ([172.27.255.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by proxy15.mail.iad3a.rsapps.net with LMTPS id QKYbF9WBU2CXSQAAHi9b9g (envelope-from <openvpn-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net>) for <patchwork@openvpn.net>; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 12:37:41 -0400 X-Spam-Threshold: 95 X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Virus-Scanned: OK X-Orig-To: openvpnslackdevel@openvpn.net X-Originating-Ip: [216.105.38.7] Authentication-Results: smtp52.gate.iad3a.rsapps.net; iprev=pass policy.iprev="216.105.38.7"; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom="openvpn-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net" smtp.helo="lists.sourceforge.net"; dkim=fail (signature verification failed) header.d=sourceforge.net; dkim=fail (signature verification failed) header.d=sf.net; dmarc=fail (p=none; dis=none) header.from=wolfssl.com X-Suspicious-Flag: YES X-Classification-ID: 41658f06-8808-11eb-817d-525400a7d0a1-1-1 Received: from [216.105.38.7] ([216.105.38.7:42122] helo=lists.sourceforge.net) by smtp52.gate.iad3a.rsapps.net (envelope-from <openvpn-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net>) (ecelerity 4.2.38.62370 r(:)) with ESMTPS (cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) id E1/3E-26667-4D183506; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 12:37:41 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <openvpn-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net>) id 1lMvdd-0000tJ-OT; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 16:36:45 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <juliusz@wolfssl.com>) id 1lMvcg-0000jA-VV for openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 16:35:46 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:Message-Id: Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=7hFBvTzCsXTKt6uaMKd7xTXevp/AZBiuVes6rjh6n3o=; b=QuLJI80kJIQRXSCiseB21wyqen XU4ppiJUrRd61NfHNL2fMFnCCl8NSgGyU/+nGTPlJKk04NrQkpGTapawhrp8DPC/6KNWWr95sfxTA IO52z6k8BFywL8k05oA4z4bBRAroenvOh8RwI7RoWsDakOXHrBY3ZmcmnrREjs+pjuXI=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From :Sender:Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To: References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post: List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=7hFBvTzCsXTKt6uaMKd7xTXevp/AZBiuVes6rjh6n3o=; b=L JtL6XnpaFtccsPvJNlNEY2jOpMN6uOOVJJxNRfhq5RF/E4pEZnU3bjMmkQwGA8FfnGLA4nVPAqdXK y42QfGk6zH9ypy8H2jqDAxks9nkzQboD3ahL8cOB9xZLvrQsmS66tzkbetqgZgu1DsUwAznwQdgW0 vG+G1uYrdX4Zb12E=; Received: from p3plsmtpa09-07.prod.phx3.secureserver.net ([173.201.193.236]) by sfi-mx-1.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.2) id 1lMvcX-00FcOb-50 for openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 16:35:45 +0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([77.254.7.13]) by :SMTPAUTH: with ESMTPSA id MvJjlCLC4w0TsMvK4lwG7b; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 09:16:32 -0700 X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=RtQAkAqK c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=60537ce0 a=wJoMW5e4oyNtTtYMQykkDQ==:117 a=wJoMW5e4oyNtTtYMQykkDQ==:17 a=VTTltBjBAAAA:8 a=nY0yCTGE356X9lFqgEUA:9 a=on_vo79ac8RWgsiwd8Ea:22 X-SECURESERVER-ACCT: juliusz@wolfssl.com From: Juliusz Sosinowicz <juliusz@wolfssl.com> To: openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 17:16:09 +0100 Message-Id: <20210318161609.76073-1-juliusz@wolfssl.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfJybRi3MwWtjhN5JBYbWN9GYvj05Bqny+ZO7M9iJSBkyjg1vyxKe3/fti+lY1jC55BiAWnkWHVNB+XAAaFB3g4m+/wfJkCZjzSXTPMb+Fbgvk/C2r/3y Znzv60B+SKh/IiByyfu4LMUxsyfsmCZRQJ9TaIvicIcKpMDtzC3rOQ16PooEvWLUnkIwg1/f3ScAC6lkVSLlJoikZi+LwIOo9GoQevuT46LZ17huN0lmH73x H5tnmHrjeaK4qoh4n0R3fQ== X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: wolfssl.com] 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [173.201.193.236 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [173.201.193.236 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders X-Headers-End: 1lMvcX-00FcOb-50 Subject: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] Add PKG_CHECK_VAR compatibility definition for old autoconf versions X-BeenThere: openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: <openvpn-devel.lists.sourceforge.net> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/options/openvpn-devel>, <mailto:openvpn-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=openvpn-devel> List-Post: <mailto:openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> List-Help: <mailto:openvpn-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel>, <mailto:openvpn-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: openvpn-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: Inbox |
| Series |
[Openvpn-devel] Add PKG_CHECK_VAR compatibility definition for old autoconf versions
|
|
Commit Message
Juliusz Sosinowicz
March 18, 2021, 5:16 a.m. UTC
Signed-off-by: Juliusz Sosinowicz <juliusz@wolfssl.com>
---
compat.m4 | 16 ++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
Comments
On 18/03/2021 17:16, Juliusz Sosinowicz wrote: > Signed-off-by: Juliusz Sosinowicz <juliusz@wolfssl.com> > --- > compat.m4 | 16 ++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/compat.m4 b/compat.m4 > index e54a7203..47650f6d 100644 > --- a/compat.m4 > +++ b/compat.m4 > @@ -64,6 +64,22 @@ ifdef( > AC_DEFUN([AC_TYPE_UINT64_T], []) > ] > ) > +ifdef( > + [PKG_CHECK_VAR], > + , > + [ > + AC_DEFUN([PKG_CHECK_VAR], > + [AC_REQUIRE([PKG_PROG_PKG_CONFIG]) > + AC_ARG_VAR([$1], [value of $3 for $2, overriding pkg-config]) > + > + _PKG_CONFIG([$1], [variable="][$3]["], [$2]) > + AS_VAR_COPY([$1], [pkg_cv_][$1]) > + > + AS_VAR_IF([$1], [""], [$5], [$4]) > + ]) > + ] > +) > + > if test -z "${docdir}"; then > docdir="\$(datadir)/doc/\$(PACKAGE_NAME)" > AC_SUBST([docdir]) I'm not seeing the rationale to why we need this; can you explain that? The TL;DR version of Chris Beams "How to write a git commit message" [1] is: git subject --->> _What_ this patch is about git body message --->> _Why_ the change is needed git diff --->> _How_ the change is solved [1] <https://chris.beams.io/posts/git-commit/>
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 06:25:13PM +0100, David Sommerseth wrote:
> I'm not seeing the rationale to why we need this; can you explain that?
See my other mail: because the previous configure.ac patch (for WolfSSL
support) breaks some platforms. Seems "some m4 bits" are not universally
there.
gert
On 18/03/2021 18:56, Gert Doering wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 06:25:13PM +0100, David Sommerseth wrote: >> I'm not seeing the rationale to why we need this; can you explain that? > > See my other mail: because the previous configure.ac patch (for WolfSSL > support) breaks some platforms. Seems "some m4 bits" are not universally > there. Right, I missed that context when looking at it ... but that context could still have been in the commit message, for the git history to explain why we needed it ;)
diff --git a/compat.m4 b/compat.m4 index e54a7203..47650f6d 100644 --- a/compat.m4 +++ b/compat.m4 @@ -64,6 +64,22 @@ ifdef( AC_DEFUN([AC_TYPE_UINT64_T], []) ] ) +ifdef( + [PKG_CHECK_VAR], + , + [ + AC_DEFUN([PKG_CHECK_VAR], + [AC_REQUIRE([PKG_PROG_PKG_CONFIG]) + AC_ARG_VAR([$1], [value of $3 for $2, overriding pkg-config]) + + _PKG_CONFIG([$1], [variable="][$3]["], [$2]) + AS_VAR_COPY([$1], [pkg_cv_][$1]) + + AS_VAR_IF([$1], [""], [$5], [$4]) + ]) + ] +) + if test -z "${docdir}"; then docdir="\$(datadir)/doc/\$(PACKAGE_NAME)" AC_SUBST([docdir])