[Openvpn-devel,15/28] Remove pointless indentation from tls_process.
Commit Message
This is probably a result from earlier code that still needed to be
C89 compatible add probably added this to allow variable decleration
---
src/openvpn/ssl.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
Comments
Acked-by: Frank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.com>
Trivial.
The commit message is a bit garbled though. Changing the
first "add" to "and" makes it better, I think. "decleration"
should be "declaration". Also remove the full stop from the
summary line and move it at the end of the body.
$ git show -w
commit fdbf34d2e4e28c334e18a677b670b8ade9f87ded
Author: Arne Schwabe <arne@rfc2549.org>
Date: Fri Apr 22 16:29:40 2022 +0200
Remove pointless indentation from tls_process.
This is probably a result from earlier code that still needed to be
C89 compatible add probably added this to allow variable decleration
diff --git a/src/openvpn/ssl.c b/src/openvpn/ssl.c
index 15af5894..097be8c0 100644
--- a/src/openvpn/ssl.c
+++ b/src/openvpn/ssl.c
@@ -2774,7 +2774,6 @@ tls_process(struct tls_multi *multi,
}
/* When should we wake up again? */
- {
if (ks->state >= S_INITIAL)
{
compute_earliest_wakeup(wakeup,
@@ -2813,7 +2812,6 @@ tls_process(struct tls_multi *multi,
return false;
}
-}
/*
* Called by the top-level event loop.
Regards,
--
Frank Lichtenheld
That was an easy one :-) ("git show -w").
Your patch has been applied to the master branch.
commit 48ed1a3dd6e1dc2849a0dd909f1c848cc2c05f91
Author: Arne Schwabe
Date: Fri Apr 22 16:29:40 2022 +0200
Remove pointless indentation from tls_process.
Acked-by: Frank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.com>
Message-Id: <20220422142953.3805364-6-arne@rfc2549.org>
URL: https://www.mail-archive.com/openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg24166.html
Signed-off-by: Gert Doering <gert@greenie.muc.de>
--
kind regards,
Gert Doering
@@ -2774,45 +2774,43 @@ tls_process(struct tls_multi *multi,
}
/* When should we wake up again? */
+ if (ks->state >= S_INITIAL)
{
- if (ks->state >= S_INITIAL)
- {
- compute_earliest_wakeup(wakeup,
- reliable_send_timeout(ks->send_reliable));
-
- if (ks->must_negotiate)
- {
- compute_earliest_wakeup(wakeup, ks->must_negotiate - now);
- }
- }
+ compute_earliest_wakeup(wakeup,
+ reliable_send_timeout(ks->send_reliable));
- if (ks->established && session->opt->renegotiate_seconds)
+ if (ks->must_negotiate)
{
- compute_earliest_wakeup(wakeup,
- ks->established + session->opt->renegotiate_seconds - now);
+ compute_earliest_wakeup(wakeup, ks->must_negotiate - now);
}
+ }
- dmsg(D_TLS_DEBUG, "TLS: tls_process: timeout set to %d", *wakeup);
+ if (ks->established && session->opt->renegotiate_seconds)
+ {
+ compute_earliest_wakeup(wakeup,
+ ks->established + session->opt->renegotiate_seconds - now);
+ }
- /* prevent event-loop spinning by setting minimum wakeup of 1 second */
- if (*wakeup <= 0)
- {
- *wakeup = 1;
+ dmsg(D_TLS_DEBUG, "TLS: tls_process: timeout set to %d", *wakeup);
- /* if we had something to send to remote, but to_link was busy,
- * let caller know we need to be called again soon */
- return true;
- }
+ /* prevent event-loop spinning by setting minimum wakeup of 1 second */
+ if (*wakeup <= 0)
+ {
+ *wakeup = 1;
- /* If any of the state changes resulted in the to_link buffer being
- * set, we are also active */
- if (to_link->len)
- {
- return true;
- }
+ /* if we had something to send to remote, but to_link was busy,
+ * let caller know we need to be called again soon */
+ return true;
+ }
- return false;
+ /* If any of the state changes resulted in the to_link buffer being
+ * set, we are also active */
+ if (to_link->len)
+ {
+ return true;
}
+
+ return false;
}
/*