[Openvpn-devel,v3] networking_sitnl: validate netlink replies against the request
Commit Message
From: Antonio Quartulli <antonio@mandelbit.com>
sitnl_send() passed every well-formed reply to the callback without
checking it matched the outstanding request: the seq/pid check was
commented out and the sequence number came from time(NULL).
Seed a monotonically increasing sequence number and drop any message
that is not from the kernel (nl_pid 0) or does not echo our port id and
sequence number.
Change-Id: Ie7352dd136cccda2bd6b6e1a36db1a5f27afd8f7
GitHub: fixes OpenVPN/openvpn-private-issues#9
Signed-off-by: Antonio Quartulli <antonio@mandelbit.com>
Acked-by: Ralf Lici <ralf@mandelbit.com>
Gerrit URL: https://gerrit.openvpn.net/c/openvpn/+/1782
---
This change was reviewed on Gerrit and approved by at least one
developer. I request to merge it to master.
Gerrit URL: https://gerrit.openvpn.net/c/openvpn/+/1782
This mail reflects revision 3 of this Change.
Acked-by according to Gerrit (reflected above):
Ralf Lici <ralf@mandelbit.com>
Comments
This is more a theoretical attack, with netlink replies received that
do not match the request, and our state machine getting confused as
a consequence... but that extra check won't do harm, and might catch
possible errors elsewhere. Antonio and Ralf are the ones who understand
Linux kernel, who am I to argue :-)
I have only lightly stared at the code (complained, got a v3 in return),
and tested on an oldish Ubuntu with and without DCO (works).
Your patch has been applied to the master and release/2.7 branch.
commit 90ab7be00e73d06f7a5bf72e6a454fcfd5f2818c (master).
commit fbcf3c449787ba200731ff65b3ffa8fb4118a8e5 (release/2.7)
Author: Antonio Quartulli
Date: Tue Sep 1 17:10:10 2026 +0200
networking_sitnl: validate netlink replies against the request
Signed-off-by: Antonio Quartulli <antonio@mandelbit.com>
Acked-by: Ralf Lici <ralf@mandelbit.com>
Gerrit URL: https://gerrit.openvpn.net/c/openvpn/+/1782
Message-Id: <20260901151017.16221-1-gert@greenie.muc.de>
URL: https://www.mail-archive.com/openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg38879.html
Signed-off-by: Gert Doering <gert@greenie.muc.de>
--
kind regards,
Gert Doering
@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@
* Bind socket to Netlink subsystem
*/
static int
-sitnl_bind(int fd, uint32_t groups)
+sitnl_bind(int fd, uint32_t groups, uint32_t *local_pid)
{
socklen_t addr_len;
struct sockaddr_nl local;
@@ -232,6 +232,14 @@
return -EINVAL;
}
+ /* We bound with nl_pid=0, so the kernel assigned this socket a unique port
+ * id (it is not the process pid - a process may own several netlink
+ * sockets). getsockname() above is the only way to learn it: hand it back
+ * to the caller, which uses it to check that replies are addressed to this
+ * socket.
+ */
+ *local_pid = local.nl_pid;
+
return 0;
}
@@ -243,6 +251,7 @@
void *arg_cb)
{
int fd, ret;
+ uint32_t local_pid = 0;
struct sockaddr_nl nladdr;
struct nlmsgerr *err;
struct nlmsghdr *h;
@@ -264,11 +273,17 @@
nladdr.nl_pid = peer;
nladdr.nl_groups = groups;
- /* NB: We currently do not verify seq and pid on answers.
- * If we ever want to start with that we probably need to come up
- * with something better than "seconds since epoch"...
+ /* Match replies to requests with a monotonically increasing sequence
+ * number, seeded once from wall-clock time so it differs between runs.
+ * The kernel echoes this seq (and our port id) in its replies, letting the
+ * receive loop below discard any unrelated or spoofed message.
*/
- payload->nlmsg_seq = (uint32_t)time(NULL);
+ static uint32_t sitnl_seq;
+ if (!sitnl_seq)
+ {
+ sitnl_seq = (uint32_t)time(NULL);
+ }
+ payload->nlmsg_seq = ++sitnl_seq;
/* no need to send reply */
if (!cb)
@@ -283,7 +298,7 @@
return -errno;
}
- if (sitnl_bind(fd, 0) < 0)
+ if (sitnl_bind(fd, 0, &local_pid) < 0)
{
msg(M_WARN | M_ERRNO, "%s: can't bind rtnl socket", __func__);
ret = -errno;
@@ -357,18 +372,23 @@
goto out;
}
- /* if (((int)nladdr.nl_pid != peer) || (h->nlmsg_pid != nladdr.nl_pid)
- * || (h->nlmsg_seq != seq))
- * {
- * rcv_len -= NLMSG_ALIGN(len);
- * h = (struct nlmsghdr *)((char *)h + NLMSG_ALIGN(len));
- * msg(M_DEBUG, "%s: skipping unrelated message. nl_pid:%d (peer:%d)
- * nl_msg_pid:%d nl_seq:%d seq:%d",
- * __func__, (int)nladdr.nl_pid, peer, h->nlmsg_pid,
- * h->nlmsg_seq, seq);
- * continue;
- * }
+ /* Discard any message that did not come from the kernel or does
+ * not match the request we sent: only the kernel (nl_pid 0) can
+ * legitimately reply, and a valid reply echoes our port id and
+ * sequence number. This prevents a local process from injecting a
+ * spoofed reply that the callback would otherwise act on.
*/
+ if ((nladdr.nl_pid != 0) || (h->nlmsg_pid != local_pid)
+ || (h->nlmsg_seq != payload->nlmsg_seq))
+ {
+ msg(D_RTNL,
+ "%s: skipping unrelated message. nl_pid:%u nlmsg_pid:%u (local:%u) nlmsg_seq:%u (seq:%u)",
+ __func__, nladdr.nl_pid, h->nlmsg_pid, local_pid, h->nlmsg_seq,
+ payload->nlmsg_seq);
+ rcv_len -= NLMSG_ALIGN(len);
+ h = (struct nlmsghdr *)((char *)h + NLMSG_ALIGN(len));
+ continue;
+ }
if (h->nlmsg_type == NLMSG_DONE)
{